EocBin

EcoBin is a dynamic soil model that simulates C and N dynamics of soil organic matter and amendments in soil. It can be used to predict carbon and nitrogen mineralization rates in soil, at the current stage it is a stand alone and does not include plant N uptake, but it does include water movement in the soil. 

EcoBin

Wageningen University & Research (WUR)

Contact: Hilde Vaessen

E-mail: hilde.vaessen@wur.nl

Website:

Link to appstore: farmmaps.eu/en/editor/plan

Price: free

EcoBin is a dynamic soil model that simulates C and N dynamics of soil organic matter and amendments in soil. It can be used to predict carbon and nitrogen mineralization rates in soil, at the current stage it is a stand alone and does not include plant N uptake, but it does include water movement in the soil.

Results presented in this app are based on the N mineralisation model SNOMIN (Berghuijs et al. 2024) and the soil water balance model (WaterUptModule) from Tipstar (Jansen, 2008). Represented with an brown  line is the predicted total mineralised N from the soil organic matter in the crop rooting zone (top 30 cm) of the soil at a specified timepoint (date), since the beginning of the year. This is denoted in the graph as mineralised N from soil organic matter.

Analysed amendment properties such as organic matter content, C/N content and apparent initial age (Janssen 1984) are used to estimate N mineralisation from an amendment applied to the soil, and is denoted with the orange line. This is the amount of N estimated to be available for crop use, without considering N losses.

N losses due to soil leaching from the bottom of the rooting zone (top 30 cm) is denoted by the green line. This assumption of leached N is calculated for bare soil without growing crops to take up mineral N. The amount of N soil losses is expected to be lower in real time since crops will take up part of the mineral N available in the rooting zone, that would otherwise be completely leached.

Total N applied is denoted with a blue line and calculated as the sum of N applied to the field from both chemical fertilizer and organic amendment application.

Based on this information, end-users may deduce how the amount of N available to the crop develops over a growing season. This can be used to reduce the total quantity of chemical fertilizer to be applied as top or side dressing. Furthermore, the app estimates mineralised N at future dates, which can also be taken into account when calculating the quantity of chemical fertilizer as top or side dressing.

For example, total N applied to the soil to support optimal potato growth and tuber harvest is 250 kg N/ ha. This may consist of a basal dressing of 175 kg N/ ha and the remaining N, 75 kg N/ ha, is added to the soil as top or side dressing. If 25 t/ ha of a specified soil amendment is applied, containing 1 kg N/ t fresh soil amendment, and the app indicates that 37 kg N/ ha mineralises from the specified amendment within the growing season, then the intended chemical fertilizer as side- or top-dressing of 75 kg N/ ha may be reduced by 37 kg N/ ha.

Aknowledgement

The App is supported by co-funding by the European Union as Horizon Europe research and innovation Grant n° 101081858 (ECONUTRI) and Grant n° 101113011 (BIN2BEAN).

References

Berghuijs H.N., J.V. Silva, P. Reidsma and A.J. de Wit, 2024. Expanding the WOFOST crop model to explore options for sustainable nitrogen management: A study for winter wheat in the Netherlands. European Journal of Agronomy 154, 127099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2024.127099

Jansen, D.M. 2008. Beschrijving van TIPSTAR: hét simulatiemodel voor groei en productie van zetmeelaardappelen. Nota/ Plant Research International, Plant Research International, Wageningen, Report no. 547. https://edepot.wur.nl/27135

Janssen B.H., 1984. A simple model for calculating decomposition and accumulation of "young" soil organic matter. Plant and Soil 181, 235-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205588

Extra info op dezelfde pagina

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Iam id ipsum absurdum, maximum malum neglegi. Quae autem natura suae primae institutionis oblita est? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Iam quae corporis sunt, ea nec auctoritatem cum animi partibus, comparandam et cognitionem habent faciliorem. Indicant pueri, in quibus ut in speculis natura cernitur. Negat esse eam, inquit, propter se expetendam.

Dicam, inquam, et quidem discendi causa magis, quam quo te aut Epicurum reprehensum velim. Quae sunt igitur communia vobis cum antiquis, iis sic utamur quasi concessis; Atqui haec patefactio quasi rerum opertarum, cum quid quidque sit aperitur, definitio est. Ego vero isti, inquam, permitto. Philosophi autem in suis lectulis plerumque moriuntur. Cuius ad naturam apta ratio vera illa et summa lex a philosophis dicitur. Eodem modo is enim tibi nemo dabit, quod, expetendum sit, id esse laudabile. At ille non pertimuit saneque fidenter: Istis quidem ipsis verbis, inquit;

Claudii libidini, qui tum erat summo ne imperio, dederetur. Quid de Platone aut de Democrito loquar? Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem; Plane idem, inquit, et maxima quidem, qua fieri nulla maior potest. Quid ei reliquisti, nisi te, quoquo modo loqueretur, intellegere, quid diceret? Etenim nec iustitia nec amicitia esse omnino poterunt, nisi ipsae per se expetuntur. Id enim volumus, id contendimus, ut officii fructus sit ipsum officium.

Contact us for questions about the zoning app